Так вообще на письмо я трачу час на эссе около трех!
И какой смысл тогда писать на время? Результат же абсолютно очевиден.
Совершенствуйте английский, продолжайте писать. Когда сам по себе результат написаниия будет удовлетворительный, тогда уже озаботитесь временем.
Я как закоренелый технарь не очень силен в методиках обучения! Скорее всего, цель посмотреть смогу ли я вообще в указанное время что то написать.
По поводу того, что нужно сначала добиться качества, потом скорости, согласен! Так обычно и делаю!
Иногда правда впадаю в полный ступор от вопроссов.-))
Плюс сложность в том, что когда я учился в школе, то вообще сочинений там не писал! В институте темболее, ибо в геодезии главное точность измерений и расчетов, а не порядок изложения мыслей на бумаге!
Но я знаю точн что время и труд все перетрут! Главное не забрасывать все! -)))
Скорее всего, цель посмотреть смогу ли я вообще в указанное время что то написать.
Я же написал вам, что это очевидно, что пока не сможете. Если вы тратите на написание письма 1 час вместо 20 мин, а на эссе 3 часа вместо 40 минут.
Улучшив сам английский и написав еще несколько десятков писем и эссе, скорость написания автоматически увеличится, так как приобретается определенный навык.
In todays world,it is private companies rather than government who pay for and carry out most on scientific research.
To wtat extent do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
There are plenty of advantages of private investments on scientific research.I will point at some of them in my essay.
First of all, private companies are more flexible in comparison with government. Reacting more adequetly on changing world and needs,they invest money in highly desireble technolodies.Thus,they significantly improve development in various spheres.Better flexibility gives opportunity to private companies to pay more attention to spheres which are not interesting for government.Mostly, owing to private investments we have best medicines,innovaitive technologies and comfortable life conditions.
Moreover,contemporary private companies have more money to invest in scientific research.Frequently,government is firmly restricted with assets,They have to pay more attention only to vital technologies such as nuclear or military.Others researches are not supported by the governmental programs. Hence,significant part of scientific researches as well as scientists are not able to exist without private investors.
And last but not list,mostly,private companies have more qualified staff.It is universally acknowledged that,qualification of staff and perfectly organised collaboration among co-workers play crucial role to researches.Therefor, private companies are more successful in scientific researches in comparison with government.
It can be concluded that,the investments of private companies in scientific research are vital for contemporary society.They are better organised,have more money and more flexible.This advantages are obvious for me.Thus,I assume that all stressed out advantages outwight possible disadvantages of using private money in scientific research.
В этот раз пользовался интернетом и словарем, хочу поднять общий уровень писанины.
Task: Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play until they are six or seven years old. Others believe that it is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible. What do you think are the advantages of attending school from a young age?
In recent years, there have been more and more families which tend to send their children to school at younger age than it used to be before. Nowadays, five or six years old kids could be seen going to school with their older classmates. There are number of facts indicating that this tendency is positive one and brings various benefits to society.
The first fact to note is that young human brain works very efficiently and is capable of processing and learning enormous amount of data. It would be a waste of time if parents didn't use this opportunity. According to a study done in 2007 by British Research Institute, children who start their study earlier, mostly at age six, have more chances to find a good job and make an excellent career in the future. Thus, it is easy to see why this trend is promoted by many.
In turn, no everyone supports these ideas. Some people argue that thier children are not mature enough at this age and playing is the best option for them. This notion could be argued back with the following fact: the best part of studying at first grade involves different kind of educative games. They help schoolchildren to develop many skills, including social communication. Therefore, the concerns about kids' age are over exaggerated and the benefits of social interaction should take precedence.
From the preceding discussion, one can see many advantages of going to school at younger age. Children obtain various skills and achieve it with less efforts and critics' concerns do not have profound basis.
В этот раз пользовался интернетом и словарем, хочу поднять общий уровень писанины.
Task: Some people believe that children should be allowed to stay at home and play until they are six or seven years old. Others believe that it is important for young children to go to school as soon as possible. What do you think are the advantages of attending school from a young age?
In recent years, there have been more and more families which tend to send their children to school at younger age than it used to be before. Nowadays, five or six years old kids could be seen going to school with their older classmates. There are number of facts indicating that this tendency is positive one and brings various benefits to society.
.
Прочитайте внимательно задание эссе, а потом ваше Вступление. О каком возрасте речь идет?
____________
Сообщение от bolo83
всезнающая дама предпенсионного возраста, которая сама непонятно как попала в Австралию
некоторые считают, что дети должны оставаться дома и играть до того, как им исполниться 6 или 7. Другие считают, что надо начинать школу как можно раньше.
Что значит как можно раньше? - 3-4
Ваш ответ что дети в 5-6 лет .... это не как можно раньше. Это практически 6-7.
Вы не отходите от темы.
____________
Сообщение от bolo83
всезнающая дама предпенсионного возраста, которая сама непонятно как попала в Австралию
Да теперь вижу проблему, правильно. Но ведь если даже 4-5 написать, это ж совсем рано или это не имеет значение? Насколько это критичная ошибка?
Это Task Achievement. Насколько критично потерять баллы за это? Плюс пропадает coherence, Я, например, несколько раз должна была перечитать все, чтобы понять что я мало что поняла
PS Во многих странах Европы обязательное обучение начинается в 3-4 года. В Австралии можно идти в школу с 4.5 лет
____________
Сообщение от bolo83
всезнающая дама предпенсионного возраста, которая сама непонятно как попала в Австралию
а что можете сказать по моей писанине?то что топик полностью не раскрыл-понимаю сам.не указал недостатки. интересует мнение знающих по вакубуляру и граматике .конструкциях предложений.спасибо огромное заранее
Boys are most influenced by their fathers and girls are most influenced by
their mothers. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons to support your
opinion.
Some people believe that a child picks up more information from the parent of
the same gender. I think there are both arguments for and against this idea.
It seems to me that generally boys and girls learn more from their fathers and
mothers accordingly. However, some children’s qualities can be developed only
by the other parent’s affection.
My main argument for is that the parent of the same gender can give a child
more practical information about their responsibilities, ways of behavior, and
their place in society. For example, mothers are good teachers for their daughters
in terms of how to become a beautiful and attractive woman, a thoughtful
girlfriend, and a caring and loving mother and wife. Boys, on the other hand,
take a pattern by their fathers. They learn that they have to be strong and
responsible in their lives, and especially in their families. This continuity provides
us with new generations adapted to the current social situations.
My main argument against is that according to many social experiments children
are still much affected by their parents of the opposite gender. In fact, girls take
their fathers as models of their future husbands. In case a girl did not have a father,
she is more likely to prefer a single life. Speaking of boys, they are greatly influenced
by their mothers in the concept of their attitude and relationships with the other
gender. Boys, whose mothers have dominating roles in families, may have problems
communicating with females.
Thus, it seems to me that both parents affect their children of both genders in
different ways. Children pick up from the parents of the same gender the practical
way of living in society. However, parents of the opposite gender may become
models of their children’s future life partners.
Vanderley, спасибо за ответ!
мы с моим преподавателем обсуждали этот вопрос.
В одном из учебников говорится, что для general training нужно использовать formal и semi-formal стиль, когда как для academic только formal.
Так вот semi-formal стиль допускает использование личных местоимений.
По крайней мере, такую установку мне дал мой преподаватель.
А как бы вы заменили личные местоимения?
"I think" -> "it is thought"?
"I believe" -> "it is believed"?
...
мне эти варианты не нравятся
Comment